ArticleJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Investigating the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Intramammary Ceftiofur Hydrochloride in Prevention of Udder Inflammation in Non-Lactating Dairy Heifers.
Article in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mastitis is the most burdensome concern for the dairy cattle industry. Antimicrobials are often prophylactically administered to dairy cows at dry-off to reduce the risk of intramammary infection during the dry period and subsequent lactation. Mastitis incidence has increased in dairy heifers after calving, leading to extralabel drug use of various dry cow products, including intramammary ceftiofur hydrochloride. However, the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of this application have yet to be studied. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and efficacy following no treatment, a non-antimicrobial teat sealant, or a single dose of intramammary ceftiofur given at 21 or 14 days before expected calving. We hypothesized that milk collected following dosing would contain drug residues below the FDA tolerance of 100 ng/mL by calving, and heifers within the ceftiofur treatment groups would have lower somatic cell counts (SCCs) than heifers in the teat sealant and nontreatment control groups. Following treatment or no treatment of 24 prepartum heifers, milk samples were collected until 21 days after calving. Somatic cell counts and ceftiofur concentrations were assessed utilizing a cell counter and UPLC/MS detection, respectively. Ceftiofur administration did not significantly reduce SCCs compared to other groups by days 7, 14, or 21. For heifers treated 14 and 21 days prior to calving, milk had a maximum ceftiofur concentration of 8.14 ± 6.24 and 4.20 ± 5.07 ng/mL 48 h into lactation, respectively. The minimal ceftiofur concentrations in milk collected from these heifers indicate that administration of ceftiofur 14 or 21 days before calving is unlikely to lead to violative residues. However, it is essential that regional regulations regarding the use of ceftiofur are adhered to.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.