ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Time to antiviral treatment in mild-moderate COVID-19 in the emergency department: influence of prescribing physician and effect on outcomes.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary objective is to know how the time from symptom onset to antiviral administration (total time, TT) affects hospitalisation and death from any cause at 30 days (composite endpoint) in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 discharged from the emergency department (ED). Secondary objectives are to know how the time from ED admission to antiviral administration (hospital time, HT) modifies outcomes and whether the specialty of the prescribing physician influences these times. We conducted a nationwide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study in 16 Spanish EDs. We collected data from patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who presented to an ED, received antiviral treatment, and were at risk of disease progression due to advanced age, comorbidities, or immunosuppression. We developed pooled logistic regression explanatory models to assess the association between TT, HT, and composite outcome, whilst we used quantile regression explanatory models to analyse the association between prescriber specialty and these times. All models were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability weighting. We analysed data on 534 treated patients. Longer TT was associated with worse outcomes, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1,179 per day of delay, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 1,005 - 1,384; but no association was observed between HT and these events, aHR 1,312, 95% CI 0,900 - 1,913. Prescription by an emergency physician was associated with a reduction both in TT and in HT (adjusted median of reduction in hours, 6,78, 95% CI 0,21 - 20,65; 8,45, 95% CI 3,92 - 12,03, respectively). Earlier ED administration of antivirals for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in vulnerable patients is associated with better clinical outcomes. Prescription by an emergency physician in the ED is also associated with shorter HT and TT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40259122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.