ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of one-year outcomes between aflibercept and brolucizumab for treatment-naïve pachychoroid neovasculopathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Choroidal Morphological Changes Between Aflibercept 8 mg and Faricimab-svoa in Treatment-Naïve Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy and Pachychoroid Neovasculopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term analysis of intravitreal brolucizumab in recalcitrant cases of chronic central serous retinopathy complicated by neovascularization (pachychoroid neovasculopathy).Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Aflibercept and Brolucizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Focused Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Considerations.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Predictive factors for the efficacy of brolucizumab in refractory polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy following aflibercept resistance.PloS one · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) is characterized by increased choroidal thickness, choroidal hyperpermeability, and fluid accumulation. Given its distinct pathophysiology, PNV requires management with anti-VEGF therapy, as its treatment response differs from typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study aimed to compare the one-year visual and anatomic outcomes between aflibercept and brolucizumab for treatment-naive PNV. A retrospective medical chart review was performed for consecutive 45 eyes from 45 patients with treatment-naive PNV initially treated with thee monthly intravitreal aflibercept (n = 28, 2.0 mg/0.05 ml) or brolucizumab (n = 17, 6.0 mg/0.05 ml) followed by as-needed regimen, followed up for at least 12 months. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT parameters including central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), changes in thickness of choriocapillaris (CC)/Sattler and Haller layer, choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated at baseline, 3-month, 6-months, and 12-month visits. At the 12-month visit, BCVA improved and CMT decreased significantly in both brolucizumab-treated group and in the aflibercept-treated group, suggesting comparable visual improvement in both groups (p < 0.05 for all). Mean SFCT were significantly reduced through 12 months of treatment in both aflibercept and brolucizumab groups (p = 0.001 for both). Decrease in CMT from the baseline for the brolucizumab-treated group was significantly greater than for the aflibercept group at month 12 (p = 0.038). Decrease in the mean SFCT and Haller layer thickness were significantly greater for the brolucizumab-treated group than that for the aflibercept-treated group at month 3 and 6 (p = 0.013 and p = 0.035). An increase of the CVI from baseline was observed only in the brolucizumab group at month 12 (p = 0.041). CC flow density did not change after 12 months in both groups. The rate of dry macula at month 12 did not differ significantly between the two groups (78.6% in aflibercept group vs. 82.4% in brolucizumab group, p = 0.104). These findings suggested that as-needed administration of brolucizumab demonstrated comparable visual outcomes to aflibercept in treatment-naïve PNV eyes. Additionally, over 12 months, brolucizumab showed a greater effect in reducing CMT, SFCT, and Haller layer thickness, as well as increasing CVI, suggesting potential choroidal morphology remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.