ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Visual prediction models for predicting rebleeding events after the first esophageal variceal ligation.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSequential endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is a standard therapy for esophageal variceal bleeding, yet poor compliance often compromises its efficacy. This study aimed to identify high-risk factors for rebleeding after initial EVL and establish a visual predictive model to improve patient follow-up and education.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we enrolled patients who underwent first-time EVL for esophageal variceal bleeding at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, between January 2017 and January 2023. Patients were allocated to training and validation cohorts. Clinical data were systematically collected, and rebleeding incidence rates within 6 weeks and 6 months post-EVL were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to explore high-risk factors influencing postoperative rebleeding and to establish visual models, evaluated with a validation set.
resultsThe study involved 629 patients in the training set and 312 in the validation set. Rebleeding occurred in 34.8% (219/629) and 80.1% (504/629) of patients within 6 weeks and 6 months after initial EVL, respectively. Esophageal variceal severity and platelet count emerged as shared independent risk factors for both 6-week and 6-month rebleeding. The nomogram models demonstrated robust predictive accuracy in the validation cohort, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.942 (95% CI 0.901-0.983) for 6-week rebleeding risk and 0.852 (95% CI 0.759-0.945) for 6-month rebleeding risk.
conclusionThis study proposes a visual prediction model designed to assess the risk of rebleeding following initial EVL in patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage to optimize clinical decision-making and improve patient management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40259093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.