ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Artificial intelligence classifies surgical technical skills in simulated laparoscopy: a pilot study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Based Automated Instrument Tracking During Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Pilot Feasibility Study.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- On AI's role in training professionals in assisted reproductive technology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a computer algorithm for the automatic classification of basic surgical skills in laparoscopy. The ability to objectively assess the operative skills of trainees would be invaluable for the success of competency-based medical education. Although technical advancements in computer vision have resulted in promising clinical applications, they have not yet been utilized in surgical education.
methodsA single-institution, prospective study involving faculty and trainee surgeons recruited to use a bench-top simulator in order to complete the "precision cutting" task from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery. An artificial intelligence (AI) computer algorithm was developed based on a transformer neural network model to classify videos of laparoscopic tasks as either executed by an expert or a novice surgeon. Performance metrics were reported in line with the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis guidelines. The model was trained using fivefold cross-validation. The model's performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The results were averaged across the folds, and 95% confidence intervals were computed for each metric. ROC curves were plotted to visualize the model's performance.
resultsThe internal dataset comprised 135 videos from 46 participants recruited between 2022 and 2023. Among these, 30 participants (65.2%) were junior surgical residents or medical students, and 16 (34.8%) were board-certified surgeons with prior laparoscopic experience. Following cross-validation, the AI model achieved an accuracy of 0.867 in classifying between novice and expert groups based on video analysis, independent of task completion time. For single-image classification, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.57.
conclusionThis proof-of-concept study serves as a pilot investigation into the application of AI for classifying surgical skills, demonstrating the utility of computer vision in automatically and objectively classifying surgical expertise. While the results show promise, further validation is necessary to establish its utility in routine surgical training and certification. By providing objective evaluations, this technology could support and enhance the role of human evaluators in surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40259088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.