Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259078›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2025

Clinical evaluation of in-office bleaching with low, medium, and high concentrate hydrogen peroxide: a 6-month a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Hanife Altınışık, Merve Nezir

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06700434 (Clinical Evaluation of In-office Bleaching With Low, Medium, and High Concentrate Hydrogen Peroxide), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06700434 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of In-office Bleaching With Low, Medium, and High Concentrate Hydrogen Peroxide: A 6-month a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsTooth DiscolorationArmsBleaching treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One-Year Color Stability of a Reduced 37.5% Hydrogen Peroxide In-Office Bleaching Protocol: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Trial
  2. Efficacy and Tooth Sensitivity of Low- Versus High-Concentration Hydrogen Peroxide for In-Office Bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanife AltınışıkDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Emek, 06510, Ankara, Turkey. hanife.kamak@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7430-4750
Merve NezirDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Emek, 06510, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-5471

Funding

The Scientific Research Fund of Gazi University TGA-2023-8355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study evaluated the longevity, efficacy, sensitivity, and impact on the oral health-related quality of life of in-office dental bleaching using low, medium, and high concentrate hydrogen peroxide. MATERIAL AND

methodsRandomized, parallel, and double-blinded clinical trial was performed with 54 participants using18% hydrogen peroxide (HP), 25%HP, and 40%HP in-office bleaching agent. Tooth color was evaluated at baseline, after the 1st session bleaching, after the 2nd session bleaching and 6 months after finishing the bleaching using spectrophotometer. Tooth sensitivity (TS) was measured with the Visual Analog Scale at baseline, immediately after bleaching, after 1 day, and after 7 days. The impact on quality of life was evaluated using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire at baseline, and 6 months after bleaching. The data were analyzed using the Kikare test, Kruskal Wallis test, one-way ANOVA, Wilcoxon, Friedman, Mann-Whitney (p < 0.05).

resultsAll groups achieved similar levels of bleaching during all evaluation times (p > 0.05), surpassing perceived value. There was no difference in TS levels among groups at all evaluation times (p > 0.05). TS significantly increased after bleaching (p < 0.05), decreased significantly after 24 h (p < 0.05), and there was no difference no difference between the initial sensitivity levels after 7 days (p > 0.05). All groups reported improved aesthetic self-perception following bleaching (p < 0.05) and there was no difference between the groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionLow, medium, and high concentrations of HP did not affect both the final tooth color and the reported TS intensity, regardless of the evaluation time. In-office bleaching provides positive effects on aesthetic perception and different HP concentrations have not influenced this positive effect. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, the efficacy, longevity, sensitivity, and impact on oral health-related quality of life of in-office bleaching using low, medium, and high concentration hydrogen peroxide agents from the same manufacturer were found to be similar. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to other in-office high-concentration hydrogen peroxide gels. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06700434.

Indexed as

Hydrogen PeroxideTooth BleachingTooth Bleaching AgentsAdultDentin SensitivityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeHydrogen PeroxideTooth Bleaching AgentsBleaching efficacyHydrogen peroxideIn-office bleachingQuality of lifeRandomized clinical trialTooth sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40259078
PMCPMC12011655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.