Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Comparison of PET/CT using
Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT in SSTR-Related Disease Patients
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor PET/CT in GLP-1R Related Disease
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor PET in indolent and aggressive insulinoma: Diagnostic performance, quantitative differences, and clinical implications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Alpha-lipoic acid as a trigger of insulin autoimmune syndrome: Current evidence, a case-based approach, diagnostic pitfalls, and practical management.Metabolism open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate preoperative localization is particularly important for surgical treatment of insulinomas. Current imaging methods, including
method47 patients with biochemically proven endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia underwent Ex4 PET/CT and other imaging methods. Sensitivity and accuracy of all imaging procedures for localizing insulinoma were calculated at the patient level and lesion level. Both clinical (>10 years experience) and junior (< 2 years experience) nuclear medicine physician readings were used to assess the diagnostic efficacy. We compared the SUV
resultsIn patient level, the sensitivity and accuracy of Ex4 PET/CT (94.11% and 95.74%) were higher than TATE PET/CT (70.59%, p = 0.026; 78.72%, p = 0.030), FDG PET/CT (50.00%, p < 0.001; 63.83%, p < 0.001), CE-CT (77.77%, p = 0.135; 72.22%, p = 0.007), and CE-MRI (63.64%, p = 0.135; 43.75%, p < 0.001), respectively. Interobserver agreement was higher for Ex4 PET/CT than TATE PET/CT and FDG PET/CT (Cohen κ, 0.839 vs. 0.707 and 0.784, respectively). SUV
conclusionEx4 PET/CT showed superior characteristics in localization compared to routine imaging modalities in benign insulinomas. Ex4 PET/CT demonstrates better imaging quality and interpretability than FDG PET/CT and TATE PET/CT. Combined Ex4 and TATE PET/CT could provide a comprehensive evaluation/localization of insulinoma.
trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at ClinitalTrial.gov (NCT06690957 and NCT06725693) on November 14, 2024 and December 5, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40259061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.