ArticleScientific reports2025
Cognitive load classification of mixed reality human computer interaction tasks based on multimodal sensor signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Physiological Metrics for Cognitive Load Assessment in Training and Operational Contexts: Signal Processing, Evidence, and Feasibility.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating cognitive load in mixed reality (MR) has become a significant challenge in human-computer interaction (HCI). To address this, we established an MR multimodal experimental platform with three distinct environments to induce varying levels of cognitive load. Participants engaged in MR-based CNC machine tool interaction tasks within these environments. Using the built-in sensors of the HoloLens 2 mixed reality head-mounted display (MR-HMD) and wearable heart rate sensors, we collected device and physiological data from participants wearing the MR-HMD while performing these tasks. The cognitive load of participants was assessed by using the NASA-TLX questionnaire. Experimental results indicated that the operation time required in the MR environment increased by 49% under high cognitive load compared to low-load conditions. High-load environments also led to increased anxiety, frustration, and decreased performance among participants. Through comparative experiments, we identified suitable sensor data streams and algorithms for cognitive load classification and designed an MR digital twin factory cognitive load warning prototype system. This system utilizes an improved Transformer-CL algorithm, achieving a cognitive load classification accuracy of 95.83%. The system provides high cognitive load warnings, reducing the risks associated with high cognitive load tasks in MR work environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.