ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Perceptions and trunk movements elicited by trunk muscle vibration in young adults in static position.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate whether proprioceptive stimulation by means of multiple muscle vibration (MV) can induce perceptual and actual trunk responses that may differ according to the stability of the body position during stimulation. Fifteen healthy young adults (25.2 ± 4.3 years old) were recruited. Muscle vibration at 80 Hz was applied to multiple abdominal and spinal muscles in sitting and standing positions with the eyes closed in order to see whether position could affect trunk responses. Perceptions and actual trunk movements were assessed using a numeric rating scale (0: no movement perception - 10: vivid movement perception) and a 3D movement analysis system (VICON), respectively. Statistical tests were used to compare different MV conditions in sitting and standing positions and correlations between outcomes. MV induced perceptions of trunk movements, with same median scores (inter-quartile range) of 5.5(3.5)/10 in both sitting and standing positions. Perception of movement in most MV conditions was mostly (37.5-75%) directed toward the direction of concentric contraction of the stimulated muscles, contrary to what is usually expected. The actual movement direction of the trunk aligned with the perceived movement, with average amplitudes in sitting and standing positions between 1.0 and 5.0° depending on the planes of movement and conditions. Amplitude of actual movement and perception scores were moderately correlated, in sitting and standing positions (ρ = 0.38, p < 0.001, both). Findings confirm that MV can temporarily modify the perception and the actual trunk posture in healthy individuals and warrant further investigation in individuals with altered trunk postures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40259023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.