ArticleScientific reports2025
A combined approach of evolutionary game and system dynamics for user privacy protection in human intelligence interaction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has generated significant economic and social value, alongside risks to user privacy. For this purpose, this study investigates privacy protection in human-AI interaction by employing a combined approach of evolutionary game and system dynamics. A three-party game model was developed to analyze the interactive effects and evolution of privacy protection strategies among the government, GenAI company, and users. Sensitivity analysis through system dynamics simulations was conducted on four kinds of factors-government, company, users, and incentive mechanisms, to reveal how these factors influence the strategy choices of the three parties. The results suggest that the government's reputation, subsidies, free-riding benefits, fines, rewards from GenAI company to users, and the cost-benefit considerations of all three parties are key factors affecting strategic decisions. Moderate fine and subsidy policies can effectively promote privacy protection, with subsidy policies proving to be more effective than penalty policies. This paper provides theoretical support and decision-making guidance for balancing technological development and privacy protection in human-AI interaction, contributing to the regulated and orderly development of Generative Artificial Intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.