Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A combined approach of evolutionary game and system dynamics for user privacy protection in human intelligence interaction.

Lan Yao, Qiyang Zhang, Shuai Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lan YaoSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Qiyang ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Shuai DengSchool of Safety and Management Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, 421002, People's Republic of China. dengshuai@hnit.edu.cn.

Funding

The Hubei Provincial Department of Education Philosophy and Social Science Research Project 22Q095The Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project 2023JJ50118the Key Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education 23a0627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has generated significant economic and social value, alongside risks to user privacy. For this purpose, this study investigates privacy protection in human-AI interaction by employing a combined approach of evolutionary game and system dynamics. A three-party game model was developed to analyze the interactive effects and evolution of privacy protection strategies among the government, GenAI company, and users. Sensitivity analysis through system dynamics simulations was conducted on four kinds of factors-government, company, users, and incentive mechanisms, to reveal how these factors influence the strategy choices of the three parties. The results suggest that the government's reputation, subsidies, free-riding benefits, fines, rewards from GenAI company to users, and the cost-benefit considerations of all three parties are key factors affecting strategic decisions. Moderate fine and subsidy policies can effectively promote privacy protection, with subsidy policies proving to be more effective than penalty policies. This paper provides theoretical support and decision-making guidance for balancing technological development and privacy protection in human-AI interaction, contributing to the regulated and orderly development of Generative Artificial Intelligence.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGame TheoryPrivacyHumansGenerative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)Incentive mechanismPrivacy protectionSensitivity analysisThree-party game model

Identifiers

PMID40259022
PMCPMC12012075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.