Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258987›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Constraints to gene flow increase the risk of genome erosion in the Ngorongoro Crater lion population.

Nicolas Dussex, Ingela Jansson, Tom van der Valk, Craig Packer, Anita Norman, Bernard M Kissui, Ernest E Mjingo, Göran Spong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Polymorphism RevealsAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolas DussexDepartment of Population Analysis and Monitoring, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. nicolas.dussex@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9179-8593
Ingela JanssonMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-1909
Tom van der ValkCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Craig PackerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, MN 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3939-8162
Anita NormanMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden.
Bernard M KissuiSchool for Field Studies, Centre for Wildlife Management Studies, Karatu, Tanzania.
Ernest E MjingoTanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI), Arusha, Tanzania.
Göran SpongMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden. Goran.Spong@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-5046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small, isolated populations are at greater risk of genome erosion than larger populations. Successful conservation efforts may lead to demographic recovery and mitigate the negative genetic effects of bottlenecks. However, constrained gene flow can hamper genomic recovery. Here, we use population genomic analyses and forward simulations to assess the genomic impacts of near extinction in the isolated Ngorongoro Crater lion (Panthera leo) sub-population. We show that 200 years of quasi-isolation and the recent epizootic in 1962 resulted in a two-fold increase in inbreeding and an excess in the frequency of highly deleterious mutations relative to other populations of the Greater Serengeti. There was little evidence for purging of genetic load. Furthermore, forward simulations indicate that higher gene flow from outside of the Crater is needed to prevent future genomic erosion in the population, with a minimum of one to five effective male migrants per decade required to reduce the risk of long-term inbreeding depression and reduction in genetic diversity. Our results suggest that in spite of a rapid post-epizootic demographic recovery since the 1970s, continued isolation of the population driven by habitat fragmentation and potentially male territoriality, exacerbate the effects of genome erosion.

Indexed as

Gene FlowGenomeLionsAnimalsFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationInbreedingMale

Identifiers

PMID40258987
PMCPMC12012037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.