ArticleScientific reports2025
Securing the CAN bus using deep learning for intrusion detection in vehicles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolving Security of the Internet of Vehicles: A Survey from Classical Machine Learning to Large Language Models, Adversarial Robustness, and Explainable AI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Multitask Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection in Controller Area Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Relational Modelling for Automotive Cybersecurity: Structural Transition and Graph-Topology-Based CAN Intrusion Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A hybrid deep learning and residual connection-based architecture for intrusion detection in autonomous vehicles.PloS one · 2026Article
- BEPCD: an ensemble learning-based intrusion detection framework for in-vehicle CAN bus.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Controller Area Network (CAN) bus protocol is the essential communication backbone in vehicles within the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), enabling interaction between electronic control units (ECUs). However, CAN messages lack authentication and security, making the system vulnerable to attacks such as DoS, fuzzing, impersonation, and spoofing. This paper evaluates deep learning methods to detect intrusions in the CAN bus network. Using the Car Hacking, Survival Analysis, and OTIDS datasets, we train and test models to identify automotive cyber threats. We explore recurrent neural network (RNN) variants, including LSTM, GRU, and VGG-16, to analyze temporal and spatial features in the data. LSTMs and GRUs handle long-term dependencies in sequential data, making them suitable for analyzing CAN messages. Bi-LSTMs enhance this by processing sequences in both directions, learning from past and future contexts to improve anomaly detection. Our results show that LSTM achieves 99.89% accuracy in binary classification, while VGG-16 reaches 100% accuracy in multiclass classification. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep learning techniques in improving the security and resilience of ITS by effectively detecting and mitigating CAN bus network attacks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.