ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of stenting on malignant central airway obstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of malignant central airway stenosis with X-ray-guided Y-shaped covered self-expanding metallic stents: evaluating efficacy and safety.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Treatment of Malignant Tracheobronchial Stenosis with Y-Shaped Stent: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Temporary airway stenting as a bridge to chemotherapy in primary mediastinal Ewing's sarcoma with critical tracheal compression: A case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Development of a phased discharge planning for patients undergoing airway stenting: a Delphi study informed by the timing it right framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various therapeutic bronchoscopy techniques, including stenting, are widely utilized in the treatment of malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO), however, little data exist on the independent clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of airway stenting on MCAO. We retrospectively analyzed 287 eligible patients with MCAO who underwent therapeutic bronchoscopy at the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2023. The length of survival was measured in months from the date of the first bronchoscopy procedure to the date of death, or until six months post-procedure or loss to follow-up. Dyspnea was assessed using the Borg score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), while quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Short Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score. All assessments were conducted consecutively at baseline, three months, and six months following the procedure. The overall survival rate was illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the Cox proportional hazards mode were applied to evaluate multiple prognostic factors affecting survival in both groups over a 6-month follow-up period. A total of 287 patients were analyzed, including 215 in the stent group and 72 in the non-stent group. A significant difference in lesion location was observed between the groups. Postoperative stenosis was significantly improved in the stent group, with 94.41% achieving grade I stenosis compared to 8.33% in the non-stent group (P = 0.001). The stent group also showed greater improvements in KPS, Borg scores, SF-6D, and 6MWD compared to the non-stent group (P = 0.001). Additionally, significant improvements in Borg score, mMRC, 6MWD, KPS, and SF-6D were maintained at three- and six-month follow-ups. The mean survival period was significantly longer in the stent group (5.1 months) compared to the non-stent group (4.6 months). The Cox proportional hazards model identified the type of stenosis (HR: 0.184, 95% CI: 0.047-0.968, P = 0.015) and the degree of stenosis after the procedure (HR: 0.211, 95% CI: 0.061-0.726, P = 0.014) as significant factors influencing survival outcomes. Airway stenting is a safe and effective procedure leading to significant improvements in clinical symptoms and QoL for patients with MCAO at a 6-month follow-up. The type and severity of stenosis were identified as significant prognostic factors for survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.