ArticleScientific reports2025
Preeclampsia prediction with maternal and paternal polygenic risk scores: the TMM BirThree Cohort Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Early pregnancy triglycerides and blood pressure: a combined predictor for preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic information from pregnant women and the paternal parent of their fetuses may provide effective biomarkers for preeclampsia (PE). This study investigated the association of parental polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for blood pressure (BP) and PE with PE onset and evaluated predictive performances of PRSs using clinical predictive variables. In the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study, 19,836 participants were genotyped using either Affymetrix Axiom Japonica Array v2 (further divided into two cohorts-the PRS training cohort and the internal-validation cohort-at a ratio of 1:2) or Japonica Array NEO (external-validation cohort). PRSs were calculated for systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and PE and hyperparameters for PRS calculation were optimized in the training cohort. PE onset was associated with maternal SBP-, DBP-, and PE-PRSs and paternal SBP- and DBP-PRSs only in the external-validation cohort. Meta-analysis revealed overall associations with maternal PRSs but highlighted significant heterogeneity between cohorts. Maternal DBP-PRS calculated using "LDpred2" presented the most improvement in prediction models and provided additional predictive information on clinical predictive variables. Paternal DBP-PRS improved prediction models in the internal-validation cohort. In conclusion, Parental PRS, along with clinical predictive variables, is potentially useful for predicting PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.