Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258898›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Modeling radiologists' cognitive processes using a digital gaze twin to enhance radiology training.

Akash Awasthi, Anh Mai Vu, Ngan Le, Zhigang Deng, Supratik Maulik, Rishi Agrawal, Carol C Wu, Hien Van Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akash AwasthiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, USA. akashcseklu123@gmail.com.
Anh Mai VuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Ngan LeDepartment of Computer Science & Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA.
Zhigang DengDepartment of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Supratik MaulikTriradiate Industries, Sugarland, TX, USA.
Rishi AgrawalDepartment of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Carol C WuDepartment of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hien Van NguyenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, USA.

Funding

SCH: AI-DOCTOR COLLABORATIVE MEDICAL DIAGNOSISR01CA277739 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI NGUYEN, HIEN VAN · 2022 to 2025
$929k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA277739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting human gaze behavior is critical for advancing interactive systems and improving diagnostic accuracy in medical imaging. We present MedGaze, a novel system inspired by the "Digital Gaze Twin" concept, which models radiologists' cognitive processes and predicts scanpaths in chest X-ray (CXR) images. Using a two-stage training approach-Vision to Radiology Report Learning (VR2) and Vision-Language Cognition Learning (VLC)-MedGaze combines visual features with radiology reports, leveraging large datasets like MIMIC to replicate radiologists' visual search patterns. MedGaze outperformed state-of-the-art methods on the EGD-CXR and REFLACX datasets, achieving IoU scores of 0.41 [95% CI 0.40, 0.42] vs. 0.27 [95% CI 0.26, 0.28], Correlation Coefficient (CC) of 0.50 [95% CI 0.48, 0.51] vs. 0.37 [95% CI 0.36, 0.41], and Multimatch scores of 0.80 [95% CI 0.79, 0.81] vs. 0.71 [95% CI 0.70, 0.71], with similar improvements on REFLACX. It also demonstrated its ability to assess clinical workload through fixation duration, showing a significant Spearman rank correlation of 0.65 (p < 0.001) with true clinical workload ranks on EGD-CXR. The human evaluation revealed that 13 out of 20 predicted scanpaths closely resembled expert patterns, with 18 out of 20 covering 60-80% of key regions. MedGaze's ability to minimize redundancy and emulate expert gaze behavior enhances training and diagnostics, offering valuable insights into radiologist decision-making and improving clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

CognitionFixation, OcularRadiologistsRadiologyHumansLarge multimodal Models(LMMs)MedGazeScanpath prediction

Identifiers

PMID40258898
PMCPMC12012060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.