ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting peak particle velocity in pre-splitting of gas-producing devices using improved particle swarm optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Monthly precipitation prediction based on quadratic decomposition and improved parrot algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advance prediction and control of vibration velocity during blasting construction is essential to protect the tunnel and surrounding buildings. In this study, we propose an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (IPSO) Backpropagation (BP) Neural Network Model (IPSO-BP) considering the effect of frequency (f) to provide a highly accurate prediction tool for predicting the peak particle velocity (PPV) generated from pre-fracture construction of gas-producing tools.The validity and consistency of this model are compared with the traditional particle swarm algorithm optimized BP neural network (PSO-BP), standard BP neural network, empirical formula, genetic-adaptive particle swarm hybrid algorithm optimized BP neural network model (GA-APSO-BP), Gray Wolf Algorithm Optimized Support Vector Regression model (GWO-SVR), Moth Flame Algorithm Optimized BP neural network model (MFO-BP), and the Rungekuta algorithm optimized extreme gradient boosting tree model (RUN-XGBoost) for multi-dimensional comparative analysis. The results show that the IPSO-BP model outperforms other models in prediction performance, both in the training set, testability, and overall. This study proves the reliability and accuracy of the IPSO-BP model in predicting the PPVs, which can contribute to improving the safety of the blasting construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.