Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Characterization of neutralizing versus binding antibody and T cell responses to varicella-zoster virus in the elderly.

Suthee Mangmee, Supasek Kardkarnklai, Suphanun Phuphanitcharoenkun, Sarocha Suthisawat, Oranit Li-Khit, Nattaya Kamchompoo, Rae Apaivongse Coad, Patimaporn Wongprompitak, Jarupa Soongsathitanon, Tararaj Dharakul and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Suthee MangmeeDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Supasek KardkarnklaiDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Suphanun PhuphanitcharoenkunDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sarocha SuthisawatDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Oranit Li-KhitDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Nattaya KamchompooDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Rae Apaivongse CoadDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Patimaporn WongprompitakDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Jarupa SoongsathitanonDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Tararaj DharakulDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Kamol SuwannakarnDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Chutikarn ChaimayoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Weerasak MuangpaisanDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Somboon IntalapapornDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Prasert AssantachaiDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Kobporn BoonnakDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. kobporn.boo@mahidol.edu.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University R016634001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related immune changes increase the risk of herpes zoster (HZ) caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation. Understanding immune responses to VZV is crucial for reducing the burden of HZ in aging populations. Due to the limited availability of data regarding the VZV immune profiles of elderly individuals, particularly in developing countries, more comprehensive immunological investigations are warranted. A total of 213 participants aged ≥ 60 years were included in this study. VZV-neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and glycoprotein-binding antibodies (BAb) were quantified. Furthermore, VZV-specific T cell subsets and their functionality were evaluated using flow cytometry. Elderly individuals demonstrated a high VZV seropositivity rate of 98.6%, exceeding that of the younger adults. Interestingly, VZV-BAb increased, whereas the proportion of NAb decreased with age, with a significantly lower proportion in the elderly aged ≥ 70 years. The elderly showed decreased naïve T cells and accumulated VZV-specific aged T cells; central memory and effector memory CD4

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHerpesvirus 3, HumanHerpes ZosterT-LymphocytesAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAgingImmunosenescenceShinglesVaricella-zoster virus

Identifiers

PMID40258885
PMCPMC12012113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.