Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258878›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of LNR and modified N stage systems for prognostic stratification of metastatic lymph nodes in stage III colorectal Cancer.

Zhao-Fu Qin, Xin-Yi Gao, Yan-Zhi Zhu, Ting Ma, Guan-Liang Chen, De-Ning Ma, Hong-Zhou Zhu, Long-Hai Feng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhao-Fu Qin *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Xin-Yi Gao *Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Yan-Zhi ZhuSchool of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Ting MaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Guan-Liang ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Yuecheng District, Zhong Xing Nan Road No. 999, Shaoxing, 312000, China.
De-Ning MaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Hong-Zhou ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China. 715040192@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-4934
Long-Hai FengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China. fenglonghai_0618@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2222-1889

Funding

Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project 2024ZL324Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project 2024ZL327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LOODS) are considered to be potentially more rigorous metastatic lymph node stratification patterns than AJCC N stage due to the integration of the number of examined lymph nodes. Based on the data of colorectal cancer obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database, comparison of the stratification performance between different prognostic models was validated by statistical methods, includingchi-square test, Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Time-dependent Area Under Curve. A prognostic outcome-oriented statistical method based on Log-rank test was performed to determine the cutoff value of LNR. External validation cohort obtained from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital was used to validate the model performance and cutoff value. In the SEER database cohort, the optimal cutoff value for adequate or inadequate lymph node clearance was 14. In performance comparisons, LNR performance was superior to lymph node count alone and similar to LODDS. The optimal cutoff values for LNR were analyzed to be 0.11 (P < 0.001), 0.39 (P < 0.001) and 0.68 (P < 0.001), respectively. The stratification performance of modified N stage phased with the above cutoff value outperforms AJCC N stage. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the differences in patient distribution between the two staging systems also demonstrated the excellence of the LNR system. Above results were verified in the external verification cohort. The modified N stage based on LNR has better stratification performance than the AJCC N stage.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node RatioLymph NodesAdultAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSEER ProgramColorectal cancerLog odds of positive lymph nodesLymph node metastasisLymph node ratioPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40258878
PMCPMC12012119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.