ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of residual coalbed methane extraction wells and analysis of development and emission reduction benefits in the Songzao mining area.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The utilization of coalbed methane (CBM) resources in closed coal mines is crucial for energy transition and green low-carbon development. This study systematically analyzed geological factors, CBM reserves, and economic factors to evaluate the potential of CBM extraction from the Songzao mining area of Chongqing. An evaluation indicator system was established, comprising 3 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 5 closed coal mines as the scheme layer. This system facilitated accurate quantification of feasibility evaluation weights for CBM extraction under complex geological conditions. The game theory was employed to refine the integration of subjective and objective weights, which ensured the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation results. A feasibility evaluation model for CBM extraction from goafs in closed coal mines was constructed using the TOPSIS method, with results ranked as follows: Songzao coal mine > Fengchun coal mine > Shihao coal mine > Yuyang coal mine > Datong No. 1 coal mine. Furthermore, the trends in energy conservation and emission reduction benefits over the past eight years since the closure of the Songzao coal mine were analyzed, encompassing both CBM emissions and power generation. The findings highlight the necessity of CBM extraction from goafs in closed coal mines in China and demonstrate the significant potential of CBM resource development for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting clean energy alternatives, providing a reference for theoretical research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.