ArticleScientific reports2025
Insights on using plastic-based dual in-plane nanopore sensors for differentiation and shape determinations of single protein molecules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Numerical characterization of electrochemical transport in three-dimensional rhombic zero-depth pores.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The evolution of nanopore measurements: from biological out-of-plane pores to plastic in-plane pores.Lab on a chip · 2026Review
- Continuous, Low Latency Estimation of the Size and Shape of Single Proteins from Real-Time Nanopore Data.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Techniques to analyze proteins often involves complex workflows and/or sophisticated equipment with modest limits-of-detection. While fluorescence spectroscopy can interrogate single molecules, it often requires fluorescence labeling with lasers and microscopes. We report herein a label-free approach for analyzing intact proteins using resistive pulse sensing (RPS). RPS data were secured using a unique RPS device, which we call a dual in-plane nanopore sensor, fabricated in a thermoplastic. The nanopore sensor was produced via nano-injection molding with critical structures of 30 nm, enabling the detection of individual protein molecules and providing an approach toward their identification. Following nano-injection molding, the pore size could be reduced to ∼ 10 nm using thermal fusion bonding of a cover plate to the molded substrate. The device architecture contained two in-plane nanopores flanking a nanochannel (50 × 50 nm width × depth and 5 µm length) that facilitated the measurement of the apparent electrophoretic mobilities of protein molecules in a label free manner via their molecular-dependent time-of-flight (ToF; time-difference between two consecutive RPS events-peak pair). We investigated four model proteins and collected multiple characteristics including RPS peak amplitude and dwell time, as well as an RPS-independent value, which was the ToF. Furthermore, we analyzed the temporal profiles of RPS events revealing distinct peak shapes for spherical and non-spherical proteins that were influenced by their rotational motion when resident within the nanopore.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.