Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258711›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025

Insecticide-treated nets distribution campaign: Physical integrity, usage and sustainable disposal of end-of-life insecticide-treated nets under operational settings in Odisha, India.

A N Shriram, Mustafa Baig, D K Panigrahi, B Vijayakumar, S S Sahu, Tatvadarshi Dash, Ashwani Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A N ShriramICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-2447
Mustafa BaigICMR - Vector Control Research Centre, Field Unit, Koraput, Odisha, India.
D K PanigrahiICMR - Vector Control Research Centre, Field Unit, Koraput, Odisha, India.
B VijayakumarICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1369-0824
S S SahuICMR - Vector Control Research Centre, Field Unit, Koraput, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-049X
Tatvadarshi DashCommunity Health Centre, Kalahandi, Odisha, India.
Ashwani KumarICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-7581

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrior to 2017, Odisha accounted for 50% of all Plasmodium falciparum cases in India. The 'National Strategic Plan' for malaria elimination had distributed 11.3 million insecticidal treated nets (ITNs) to 23 million individuals in Odisha's 17 malaria-endemic districts by 2017. In 2021, the National Centre for Vector-Borne Disease Control replaced end-of-life ITNs. India needs official regulations on end-of-life ITNs collection and disposal mechanisms. A pilot study was undertaken to understand community practices and perceptions on end-of-life ITNs.

methodsThe 2021 study was conducted during mass ITN replenishment in a campaign mode at Koksara Community Health Centre in Odisha's Kalahandi region. ITN conditions were evaluated using structured questionnaires and household interviews. End-of-life ITNs were evaluated for chemical analyses. Door-to-door assessments of net conditions included noting their presence, attrition rates and fabric integrity. Officials from the Department of Health were consulted on eco-friendly disposal techniques.

resultsIn the study region, 6022 ITNs were distributed, of which 5879 (97.6%) were available and 143 (2.4%) were reported as missing 43 months after the campaign (2017). One net per 2.1 persons was distributed. Of the 5879 ITNs, 84.2% were torn, 931 (15.8%) were in good condition and 3472 (59.1%) were serviceable. When combining the ITNs in good condition and those that were serviceable, 74.9% were deemed usable. A total of 3050 respondents were interviewed. Most respondents (98%, 2935/3050) were willing to exchange old ITNs for new ones (92.5%, 5437/5879) when replaced with new ones, highlighting the need for a disposal mechanism at both programme and household levels. Additionally, 61.6% of respondents chose to keep their ITNs, while others repurposed them (7.3% for covering items, 3.0% for fencing, 4.6% for nursery saplings, 5.6% for fishing, 0.4% for other uses). The end-of-life PermaNet 2.0 nets contained an average of 0.33 ± 0.35 g/kg (15.3 mg/m

conclusionsCommunity input on end-of-life ITN disposal contributes to the development of evidence-based decision support materials, facilitating the formulation of a strategy for the systematic collection and safe disposal of used nets. The lack of an operationally viable solution for the secure disposal of end-of-life ITNs within the National Programs underscores the urgent need for a comprehensive policy framework.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMosquito ControlAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairesdisposalend‐of‐life ITNsmalariaOdishaphysical statuspractices

Identifiers

PMID40258711
PMCPMC12136938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.