ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
Predictors of Sleep Latency From the Multiple Sleep Latency Test: A Random Forest Investigation in a Community Sample.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Sleep Latency From the Multiple Sleep Latency Test: A Random Forest Investigation in a Community Sample.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to advance the understanding of factors that predict mean sleep latency (MSL) on the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) by applying machine learning methodology on a high-dimensional dataset from a large community sample. A cross-sectional analytic dataset of first visit clinical-protocol MSLTs (without shift workers) was developed from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study, a community-based longitudinal study of middle-aged to older adults in Wisconsin, USA. Fifty predictors captured demographics, medical and psychiatric health, sleep (diary; polysomnography [PSG]) and circadian characteristics. The random forest (RF) algorithm identified the 10 most important predictors, which underwent subsequent regression analyses. Primary analyses focused on MSLT MSL, whereas secondary analyses centred on nap-specific sleep latencies. Post hoc analyses further explored the relationship between circadian preference and MSLT MSL. The primary sample (n = 301) of middle-aged adults (mean age = 57.5 ± 7.71 years) was predominantly non-Hispanic White (97%) and nearly equal across sexes (percentage female = 51.8%). RF model showed low explanatory value for MSLT MSL (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.