Trial reportRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases2025
Effect of Eccentric Cycling on Oxygen Uptake and Hemodynamics in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Trial report in Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects on Exercise Tolerance and Functional Outcomes of Eccentric versus Concentric Aerobic Exercise in People with COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Pooled it
- [Effects ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical UniversityTrial
- Inspiratory Muscle Training for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and contributes significantly to reduced quality of life due to symptoms such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) has shown potential as an alternative to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) in cardiopulmonary disease, including COPD, as it has a lower metabolic demand and potentially allows for higher exercise intensity with less perceived exertion. We aimed to compare ventilatory and circulatory responses of COPD patients between ECC and CON at identical submaximal workloads.
methodsIn a randomized-controlled crossover trial, 17 COPD patients (6 female, mean ± SD age 67 ± 7 years) completed identical submaximal stepwise incremental cycling tests using ECC and CON, each step increasing by 10 W. The main outcome was oxygen uptake (<inline-formula><mml:math id="m1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additional outcomes were breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements including minute ventilation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="m2" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and hemodynamics by echocardiography at each step.
resultsAt a mean end-exercise intensity of 41.3 ± 3.5 W, ECC lowered <inline-formula><mml:math id="m3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -122 mL/min (-25%, 95% CI: -213 to -47, p = 0.005) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="m4" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -5.7 L/min (-29%, 95% CI: -10.0 to -1.6, p = 0.012) compared to CON. Perceived dyspnea and leg fatigue did not differ. A trend toward reduced strain on the right ventricle was observed in ECC (37 ± 13 mm Hg ECC vs. 48 ± 7 mm Hg CON), but this was not significant (p = 0.063). No adverse events occurred.
conclusionECC allowed COPD patients to exercise at the same workload but with a lower metabolic and ventilatory demand compared to CON, suggesting it has the potential to further improve exercise capacity in pulmonary rehabilitation. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.