Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Levels of concentrates and protein sources in intensive pasture-based beef cattle rearing during the rainy season in the Amazon biome.

Artur Carmanini de Faria, Dheyme Cristina Bolson, Douglas Dos Santos Pina, Carla Silva Chaves, Thiago Trento Biserra, Thiago Alves Prado, Dalton Henrique Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Artur Carmanini de FariaGrupo de Estudos em Pecuária Integrada - GEPI, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Dheyme Cristina BolsonDepartamento de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento da Fortuna Nutrição Animal, Nova Canaã do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Douglas Dos Santos PinaAnimal Science Department, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Carla Silva ChavesGrupo de Estudos em Pecuária Integrada - GEPI, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9498-0684
Thiago Trento BiserraDepartamento de Pesquisa da Fundação M.T., Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Thiago Alves PradoDepartamento de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento da Fortuna Nutrição Animal, Nova Canaã do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Dalton Henrique PereiraGrupo de Estudos em Pecuária Integrada - GEPI, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3128-1103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different nutritional strategies on the intensification of beef cattle farming on pastures during the rainy season. Eighty male cattle (testers) were randomly allocated to 16 paddocks formed with Mombaça grass (Megathyrsus maximus), totaling five animals (testers) per paddock. The strategies consisted of two levels of concentrates (LC) [7 and 10 g.kg-1 of body weight (BW)], i.e., low and high LC, and two protein sources (PS) with dried distillers' grain with solubles (DDGS) and soybean meal (SBM) in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The forage's chemical, structural, and productive characteristics and the supplemented animals' performance, productivity, and serum parameters were evaluated. The forage had the greatest height (P = 0.038) at the lowest LC; however, a greater leaf proportion (P = 0.049) and leaf: stem ratio (L:S) (P = 0.042) were observed when the highest LC was used. The animals receiving the highest LC had the highest supplement intake (P < 0.001) and a lower pasture intake (P = 0.001). The average daily gain (ADG) did not differ between the LC (P = 0.135) and PS (P = 0.190) groups (0.97 kg.day-1). The LC used in the nutritional strategies did not affect the stocking rate (P = 0.272) or productivity (P = 0.986). Supplementation of 7 g.kg-1 BW is recommended for intensive rearing of beef cattle during the rainy season, as it results in high gains at a relatively low cost. In addition, as there were no negative responses to the use of DDGS as a protein source in the supplement, it represents an alternative for replacing soybean meal in the formulations.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBrazilCattleGlycine maxMaleRainSeasons

Identifiers

PMID40258229
PMCPMC12011373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.