Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258220›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Statistical signature of subtle behavioral changes in large-scale assays.

Alexandre Blanc, François Laurent, Alex Barbier-Chebbah, Hugues Van Assel, Benjamin T Cocanougher, Benjamin M W Jones, Peter Hague, Marta Zlatic, Rayan Chikhi, Christian L Vestergaard and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexandre BlancInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3571, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-5223
François LaurentInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3571, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-6400
Alex Barbier-ChebbahInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3571, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.
Hugues Van AsselÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, UMPA, Lyon, France.
Benjamin T CocanougherUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Benjamin M W JonesUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter HagueUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marta ZlaticUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rayan ChikhiG5 Sequence Bioinformatics, Department of Computational Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Christian L VestergaardInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3571, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.
Tihana JovanicInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 9197, Saclay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0525-8620
Jean-Baptiste MassonInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3571, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5484-9056
Chloé BarréInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3571, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nervous system can generate various behaviors, including motor responses, which we can observe through video recordings. Recent advances in gene manipulation, automated behavioral acquisition at scale, and machine learning enable us to causally link behaviors to their underlying neural mechanisms. Moreover, in some animals, such as the Drosophila melanogaster larva, this mapping is possible at the unprecedented scale of single neurons, allowing us to identify the neural microcircuits generating particular behaviors. These high-throughput screening efforts, linking the activation or suppression of specific neurons to behavioral patterns in millions of animals, provide a rich dataset to explore the diversity of nervous system responses to the same stimuli. However, important challenges remain in identifying subtle behaviors, including immediate and delayed responses to neural activation or suppression, and understanding these behaviors on a large scale. We here introduce several statistically robust methods for analyzing behavioral data in response to these challenges: 1) A generative physical model that regularizes the inference of larval shapes across the entire dataset. 2) An unsupervised kernel-based method for statistical testing in learned behavioral spaces aimed at detecting subtle deviations in behavior. 3) A generative model for larval behavioral sequences, providing a benchmark for identifying higher-order behavioral changes. 4) A comprehensive analysis technique using suffix trees to categorize genetic lines into clusters based on common action sequences. We showcase these methodologies through a behavioral screen focused on responses to an air puff, analyzing data from 280 716 larvae across 569 genetic lines.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsComputational BiologyDrosophila melanogasterLarvaMachine LearningModels, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalNeurons

Identifiers

PMID40258220
PMCPMC12121925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.