Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258203›Full record

ArticleNeurology2025

Composite Confirmed Disability Worsening/Progression Is a Useful Clinical Endpoint for Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Ludwig Kappos, Sean Yiu, Frank Dahlke, Timothy Coetzee, Gary R Cutter, Steven Yuen, Ulrike Bonati, Fred D Lublin

6 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00087529 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Phase II/III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Adults With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2004Enrolled439ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsplacebo, rituximab
NCT01194570 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Adults With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2022Enrolled735ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Primary ProgressiveArmsOcrelizumab, Placebo
NCT01247324 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif®) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2022Enrolled821ConditionsRelapsing Multiple SclerosisArmsInterferon beta-1a, Ocrelizumab-matching placebo, Ocrelizumab, Interferon beta-1a-matching placebo
NCT01412333 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2022Enrolled835ConditionsRelapsing Multiple SclerosisArmsInterferon beta-1a, Ocrelizumab-matching placebo, Ocrelizumab, Interferon beta-1a-matching placebo
NCT03085810 phase3terminatednot on this map

An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Early Stage Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2017 to 2023Enrolled1,225ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsOcrelizumab
NCT03523858 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

An Open-Label, Single-Arm 4-Year Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Ocrelizumab Treatment in Patients With Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2018 to 2026Enrolled927ConditionsProgressive Multiple Sclerosis (PMS)ArmsOcrelizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of the impact of outcome definitions on power in multiple sclerosis clinical trials.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ludwig KapposResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-5509
Sean YiuRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Frank DahlkeImpulze GmbH Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3333-6291
Timothy CoetzeeNational Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3031-7549
Gary R CutterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-980X
Steven YuenGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Ulrike BonatiF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; and.
Fred D LublinDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-5722-0475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSensitive and meaningful disability worsening measures remain an unmet medical need in multiple sclerosis (MS). Composite confirmed disability worsening/progression (cCDW/cCDP) combines the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) with performance tests of ambulation and dexterity (Timed 25-Foot Walk Test [T25FWT] and Nine-Hole Peg Test [9HPT]). We assessed the relation of changes in these measures to understand the utility of cCDW/cCDP as an endpoint for MS trials.

methodsClinical trials measuring all components of cCDW were selected for the analysis of (i) individual patient-level data from Roche-sponsored MS studies to characterize the association between performance-test changes and subsequent EDSS changes and (ii) population-level data from published studies reporting treatment effects on EDSS and either cCDP or T25FWT or 9HPT events to examine the relationship between treatment effects on T25FWT and EDSS events.

resultsAnalysis (i): 6 Roche-sponsored Phase III trials comprising 4,979 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS; n = 1,225), relapsing MS (RMS; n = 1,656), progressive MS (PMS; n = 922), and primary progressive MS (PPMS; n = 1,171), with a data cutoff of November 2022, were included in the individual patient analyses. For all trials, T25FWT events were associated with increased risk of subsequent EDSS events (hazard ratios [HRs], DISCUSSION: In this post hoc analysis, worsening on T25FWT or 9HPT was a harbinger of EDSS worsening and treatment effects on T25FWT correlated with those on EDSS. These results establish the predictive validity and clinical relevance of performance-test worsening, thus supporting use of cCDW/cCDP as a primary outcome for progression in MS trials. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIERS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01247324 (OPERA I); first submitted November 23, 2010; first patient enrolled: August 31, 2011; available at clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01247324. NCT01412333 (OPERA II); first submitted August 8, 2011; first patient enrolled: September 20, 2011; available at clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01412333. NCT03085810 (ENSEMBLE); first submitted March 16, 2017; first patient enrolled: March 27, 2017; available at clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03085810. NCT01194570 (ORATORIO); first submitted August 28, 2010; first patient enrolled: March 3, 2011; available at clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01194570. NCT03523858 (CONSONANCE); first submitted April 16, 2018; first patient enrolled: May 28, 2018; available at clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03523858. NCT00087529 (OLYMPUS); first submitted July 9, 2004; first patient enrolled: July 9, 2004; available at clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00087529.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationDisease ProgressionMultiple SclerosisAdultClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID40258203
PMCPMC12136489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.