ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
A New Model of Care: Community Appointment Day Outcomes and Impact on Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Waiting Times.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Acceptability of Musculoskeletal Community Appointment Days: A Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to test the introduction of Community Appointment Days (CADs) for patients on the Musculoskeletal (MSK) Physiotherapy waiting list in Lanarkshire, UK.
methodsA multi-professional team developed, implemented, and evaluated the first 2 CADs on 16th and 17th April, 2024. The mixed-methods design involved patients completing a "passport" (which included a survey) on the day and being followed up 4 weeks later by survey or interview. The patient management system was interrogated for waiting times and numbers returning to the service within 6 months. Structured thematic analysis was used to create a conceptual model from the qualitative data.
resultsMore than 3 times as many patients were booked into a CAD appointment (n = 443) compared to routine outpatient clinics (n = 133), and the vast majority reported positive outcomes. A total of 52 attendees (12%) were discharged on the day and a further 202 (46%) with Patient Initiated Review (PIR). Only 126 (28%) were given a follow-up 1:1 Physiotherapy appointment, although 63 (14%) did not attend on the day. Of the 443 booked, 26 (6%) returned for an additional review MSK outpatient appointment within 6 months.
conclusionsThe CADs had positive outcomes for patients and were successful in reducing waiting times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.