ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Linking energetic instability to compositional changes in biological communities.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome assembly statistics toward ecosystem-scale insights, forecasting, and management.The ISME journal · 2026Review
- Linking energetic instability to compositional changes in biological communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The resilience of an ecological community informs us how it will respond to future environmental disturbances. However, the concept is rarely tested in the context of predicting biodiversity change, particularly at broad spatial and taxonomic scales. Here, we show that measures of instability derived from the resilience of the current state of community compositions greatly improve the predictability of biodiversity change. We applied energy landscape analysis (ELA) to community compositions of both simulated and natural ecosystems of distinctive regions and taxa (birds, fishes, mollusks, and phytoplankton) and estimated the resilience of those systems. We found that a metric of local instability, which represents how current community states are inflated from local optima, explained well the magnitude of species turnover and energy changes from the current to future states for both simulated and real communities. A metric of global instability, which represents a community's tendency to cross-over ridges of local basins of attraction to alternate stable states, also served as a weaker yet significant index of such changes. Our ELA results suggest that quantifying the resilience of real ecosystems is essential for understanding the mechanisms of community dynamics in an effort to improve the prediction of biodiversity change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.