Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258089›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Isolating selective from non-selective forces using site frequency ratios.

Jody Hey, Vitor A C Pavinato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Estimating the evolutionary fitness of specific synonymous codon changes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jody HeyDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-6488
Vitor A C PavinatoDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Reinventing dN/dS and the study of natural selectionR01GM144468 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HEY, EMANUEL, POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2022 to 2025
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new method is introduced for estimating the distribution of mutation fitness effects using site frequency spectra. Unlike previous methods, which make assumptions about non-selective factors, or that try to incorporate such factors into the underlying model, this new method mostly avoids non-selective effects by working with the ratios of counts of selected sites to neutral sites. An expression for the likelihood of a set of selected/neutral ratios is found by treating the ratio of two Poisson random variables as the ratio of two gaussian random variables. This approach also avoids the need to estimate the relative mutation rates of selected and neutral sites. Simulations over a wide range of demographic models, with linked selection effects show that the new SFRatios method performs well for statistical tests of selection, and it performs well for estimating the distribution of selection effects. Performance was better with weak selection models and for expansion and structured demographic models than for bottleneck models. Applications to two populations of Drosophila melanogaster reveal clear but very weak selection on synonymous sites. For nonsynonymous sites, selection was found to be consistent with previous estimates and stronger for an African population than for one from North Carolina.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterGenetic FitnessGenetics, PopulationMutationMutation Rate

Identifiers

PMID40258089
PMCPMC12064048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.