Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40258015›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Fetal macrosomia and its associated factors among pregnant women delivered at national referral hospital in Uganda, a case-control study.

Peter Wanyera, Eve Nakabembe, Mike Nantamu Kagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter WanyeraDepartment of obstetrics and gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Eve NakabembeDepartment of obstetrics and gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Mike Nantamu KagawaDepartment of obstetrics and gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-5048-685X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe delivery of macrosomic newborns (newborns>4000gm) is increasing steadily worldwide and yet it is associated with many complications. The risk factors for fetal macrosomia include weight at first antenatal visit, previous delivery of a large newborn, newly diagnosed diabetes in pregnancy, increasing number of deliveries, a male fetus, and many others. There is paucity of data on fetal macrosomia in Uganda and the objective of this study therefore was to determine the risk factors for fetal macrosomia among women who delivered at a National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda..

methodsAn unmatched case-control study was conducted among 177 cases and 354 controls at Kawempe National Referral Hospital. Data was collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires for three months from 8th February 2021-25th May 2021. Comparison between the cases and the controls was done using the student t-test for normally distributed continuous data. The Mann Whitney U Test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test) was used to compare data that was not normally distributed. Binary logistic regression was used in bivariate and multivariate analysis for factors associated with fetal macrosomia using STATA version 16.0.

resultsA total of 531 participants were recruited into the study in a ratio of one case to two controls. The mean age for cases was 28.5 ± 5.9 years and 25.9 ± 5.4 years for controls while the mean weight was 78.4 ± 12.4Kgs for cases and 68.2 ± 11.7 Kg for controls. Risk factors for fetal macrosomia included maternal age ≥40 years (aOR = 7.4, [95%CI 1.37-39.44], p value = 0.020), maternal weight ≥80 kg (aOR = 4.0, [95%CI 2.15-7.40], p value <0.001), maternal height ≥160 cm (aOR = 1.6, [95%CI 1.02-2.51], p value = 0.040), being married (aOR = 2.55, [95%CI 1.08-6.06], P value = 0.038), gestation age ≥40 weeks (aOR = 1.8,[95%CI 1.16-2.82], p value = 0.009), previous macrosomia (aOR = 2.2, [95%CI 1.26-3.81], p value = 0.006) and male babies (aOR = 1.78, [95%CI 1.14-2.77], p value = 0.011).

conclusionsThe main risk factors for fetal macrosomia were higher maternal weight and height, advanced age as well as post-datism, previous delivery of a large newborn, male fetus and being in a marital relationship. A well-designed protocol to identify women with risk factors for fetal macrosomia may help to provided targeted interventions in this group.

Indexed as

Fetal MacrosomiaAdultBirth WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsUgandaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40258015
PMCPMC12011244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.