ArticleClinical drug investigation2025
Economic Evaluation of Penpulimab Plus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Therapy as First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in China.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPenpulimab is a PD-1 monoclonal antibody recommended for treating squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of penpulimab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin against paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC in China.
methodsA three-state partitioned survival model was constructed using the efficacy outcomes obtained by digitizing the AK105-302 trial and was extrapolated to the lifetime horizon. Data on direct medical costs and utilities was gathered from the literature and commercial databases from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (LYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were performed to test the model robustness.
resultsThe incremental efficacy of penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin was 0.821 QALYs and 1.176 LYs with an incremental cost of $20,335 compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination therapy. The ICER was $24,778 per QALY, falling below the threshold of three times the per capita gross domestic product of China, a commonly applied benchmark. The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ICER values were primarily influenced by the utility of progression-free state and cost of penpulimab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin was cost-effective for 98.3% of the cases. Scenario analysis yielded results similar to those of the base-case analysis.
conclusionsOur analysis suggests that penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin combination therapy is cost-effective for patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.