ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
Second primary cancers among males with a first primary prostate cancer: a population-based study in Northern Portugal.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When PSMA is not enough: the diagnostic blind spots of PSMA PET/CT and the added value of [¹⁸F]FDG in high-risk prostate cancer: dual-tracer cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased survival and life expectancy among patients with prostate cancer results in an increased risk of developing a second primary cancer (SPC). We aimed to describe the occurrence of SPCs in a population-based cohort with a prostate first primary cancer (FPC), in Northern Portugal. A cohort of 13,222 patients with a prostate FPC from the North Region Cancer Registry of Portugal, diagnosed between 2000 and 2009, was followed until 31 December 2021, for synchronous (within six months of FPC diagnosis) and metachronous SPCs (all others). We describe absolute and relative frequencies of SPCs, incidence rates and standardized incidence ratios of SPCs (compared to the male general population), and cumulative incidence of metachronous SPCs. A total of 1953 (14.8%) patients with a prostate FPC developed an SPC, mostly of the colon, lung and bladder; synchronous SPCs occurred mainly in the bladder. Compared to the general male population, patients with a prostate FPC had a globally lower incidence of all cancers, and lung and oesophagus cancers, but a higher incidence of bladder and pancreas cancers. Overall, the incidence of synchronous SPCs was also significantly higher, likely reflecting the incidental diagnosis of SPCs. The 20-year cumulative incidence of metachronous SPCs was 15.4%. Patients with a prostate FPC had a lower overall incidence of SPCs than the general male population, despite a higher incidence in the first six-months after the SPC diagnosis. After that period, one out of seven may be expected to develop an SPC within two decades. Continued cancer surveillance among survivors is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.