Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257682›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

New records of fleas and ticks (Siphonaptera and Ixodida) parasitizing wild mammals in Mossoró Municipality, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.

Ícaro Costa Moreira, Ana Caroline Freitas Caetano de Sousa, Luana Priscila Gomes Cândido, Maria Danielle Chagas Dos Santos, Ana Beatriz Pinheiro Guerra, Carlos Iberê Alves Freitas, Moacir Franco de Oliveira, Thiago Fernandes Martins, Ricardo Bassini-Silva, Josivania Soares Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ícaro Costa MoreiraLaboratório de Parasitologia Animal, Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-1822
Ana Caroline Freitas Caetano de SousaHospital Veterinário da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-9704
Luana Priscila Gomes CândidoLaboratório de Parasitologia Animal, Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6695-6482
Maria Danielle Chagas Dos SantosEconservation- Estudos e Projetos Ambientais, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8866-4421
Ana Beatriz Pinheiro GuerraLaboratório de Parasitologia Animal, Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8045-2491
Carlos Iberê Alves FreitasLaboratório de Estudos em Imunologia e Animais Silvestres, Departamento de Ciências Animais, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-3528
Moacir Franco de OliveiraLaboratório de Morfofisiologia Animal Aplicada, Departamento de Ciências Animais, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-0823
Thiago Fernandes MartinsInstituto Pasteur, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7325-3362
Ricardo Bassini-SilvaLaboratório de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. ricardo.bassini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9568-4120
Josivania Soares PereiraLaboratório de Parasitologia Animal, Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2407-9417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caatinga is a Brazilian biome with limited studies on its wild mammal fauna, including the ectoparasitic relationships in these animals. This study aims to report the findings of fleas and ticks infesting wild animals rescued in the municipality of Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte State (RN), Brazil, and treated at the Veterinary Hospital of the Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (HOVET-UFERSA). During the clinical assessments and physical examinations of the host animals (one male Cerdocyon thous L.; two females of Tamandua tetradactyla L.; one male Leopardus tigrinus Schreber; and one male Conepatus semistriatus Boddaert), fleas and ticks were collected. These ectoparasites were removed mechanically and sent to the Animal Parasitology Laboratory at UFERSA for identification. Identification was carried out based on morphology, with the aid of specific literature, stereomicroscopy, and light optical microscopy. From C. thous, two males of Amblyomma parvum Aragão and four female Pulex irritans (L.) fleas were recovered. From the adult female T. tetradactyla, one male of Rhipicephalus linnaei (Audouin), eight nymphs, and two males of Amblyomma auricularium (Conil) were collected. From the juvenile female T. tetradactyla, three nymphs of A. parvum and six female fleas of the species Tunga penetrans (L.) were recovered. From the male L. tigrinus, five females and one male flea of the species Ctenocephalides felis (Bouche) were collected. Finally, from the male C. semistriatus, two nymphs, 19 males, and six females of A. auricularium were recovered. This study contributes to expanding the knowledge of host-parasite relationships in free-living mammals in the Caatinga biome, in western Rio Grande do Norte.

Indexed as

FelidaeFlea InfestationsIxodidaeSiphonapteraTick InfestationsAnimalsAnimals, WildBrazilFemaleMaleCarnivoraFleaPilosaTick

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.