ArticleNeurology and therapy2025
Real-World Experience with FcRn Inhibitors Efgartigimod and Rozanolixizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Administration in Multiple Cycles and Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Formulation.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in myasthenia gravis: A meta-analysis of different antibody subtypes.Immunologic research · 2026Pooled it
- Practical Guidance on Initiating and Switching Targeted Immunotherapies in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A German-Austrian Expert Opinion Paper.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod Versus Lymphoplasmapheresis as Preoperative Rapid Antibody-Clearing Therapies for Thymectomy in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Outcomes Compared to Conventional Preparation.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of zilucoplan in patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis: A retrospective cohort study in France.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Depletion and recovery of IgG following treatment with an anti-FcRn antibody and IdeS in pigtail macaques.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous response to efgartigimod in real-world experience with myasthenia gravis: Predictors and treatment strategies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- MuSK myasthenia gravis: from antigen-antibody to clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in very-late-onset myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurologyReview
- Real-world use of efgartigimod in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis: experience from two centers in Greece and Cyprus.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab have not long been introduced for treating generalized myasthenia gravis (MG); hence, real-world evidence for their administration in multiple cycles and switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation remains insufficient.
methodsWe retrospectively assessed 17 consecutive patients with generalized MG and diverse backgrounds who were treated with FcRn inhibitors.
resultsAll patients initially received an intravenous efgartigimod formulation. Of 17 patients, 10 (59%) were considered responders, defined as a persistent improvement of at least two points for a minimum of four consecutive weeks in the MG activities of daily living score during the first treatment cycle. Four of the non-responders in the first cycle demonstrated an improvement in fulfilling the criteria for responders in the second cycle. One of these patients, who had thymoma metastatic lesions, experienced a significant worsening of MG symptoms during the first treatment cycle. Five patients switched from intravenous to subcutaneous formulations, which was successful in all patients. The efficacy of the subcutaneous formulations was similar to that of the intravenous formulation, even in patients who switched from efgartigimod to rozanolixizumab. The drugs were well tolerated without any drug-related serious adverse events irrespective of the formulation type.
conclusionFcRn inhibitors were effective and safe in patients with generalized MG, but their efficacy may depend on the disease activity during treatment. The transition from the intravenous formulation to more convenient subcutaneous formulations was successful, indicating the likely growth of future demand for subcutaneous formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.