Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257641›Full record

ArticlePituitary2025

Impulse control disorders in patients with pituitary adenoma managed with or without dopamine agonists: a cross-sectional study from a UK centre.

Ross Hamblin, Mary White, Athanasios Fountas, Niki Karavitaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ross HamblinDepartment of Metabolism and Systems Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, IBR Tower, Level 2, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-0458
Mary WhiteCentre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK.
Athanasios FountasDepartment of Metabolism and Systems Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, IBR Tower, Level 2, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9467-3411
Niki KaravitakiDepartment of Metabolism and Systems Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, IBR Tower, Level 2, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. n.karavitaki@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-0643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudies from various countries raise concerns on the association between dopamine agonist (DA) treatment and impulse control disorders (ICDs) in patients with pituitary adenomas. We investigated the prevalence of ICDs in patients with pituitary adenomas in a UK centre using two instruments applied in clinical practice for assessing ICDs.

methodsCross-sectional study of adults with prolactinoma, acromegaly or non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) treated or not with DAs in a pituitary centre. Screening tools for ICD were the Minnesota Impulse Disorders Interview (MIDI) and Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (QUIP-RS).

resultsData from 200 patients were analysed [72 prolactinomas (on DA), 71 NFPAs (no DA), 57 with acromegaly (12 on DA)]. The percentage of patients scoring for any ICD was higher in the prolactinoma on DA group compared with the NFPA cases; MIDI 12.7% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.02) and QUIP-RS 46.5% vs. 18.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. DA use was associated with positive scores for all ICDs in the MIDI and with compulsive buying and hobbyism-punding in the QUIP-RS. DA dose or treatment duration were not associated with positive scores. The responses of patients with acromegaly on DA did not differ from those not on these agents in any questionnaire.

conclusionsIn this sample of UK patients, prevalence of ICDs is higher in prolactinoma patients on DA compared to those with NFPA not on DA. Differences were not observed between patients with acromegaly treated or not with DA. Different ICD assessment tools have an impact on the detected outcomes.

Indexed as

AdenomaDisruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct DisordersDopamine AgonistsPituitary NeoplasmsAcromegalyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProlactinomaSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomDopamine AgonistsAcromegalyDopamine agonistImpulse controlPituitary adenomaProlactinoma

Identifiers

PMID40257641
PMCPMC12011938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.