ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Pulsed field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation utilizing a simplified approach or a standard approach-insights from the fast and furious PFA study.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concomitant Pulse Field Ablation Based LAA Isolation Plus LAAC.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Anaesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation Procedures.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal energy source. Recently, we developed a tailored and streamlined pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) approach utilizing a pentaspline PFA catheter via a single access, single catheter approach. This study was aimed at comparing safety, efficacy, and follow-up of this approach with a conventional approach. METHODS AND
resultsFifty consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent first-time PVI via PFA under deep sedation. The first 25 patients were treated with a conventional approach utilizing two femoral vein access sheath inclusive utilization of 3D mapping and a coronary sinus catheter (conventional approach, control group). The second 25 patients were treated via a simplified single venous, single transseptal puncture, single catheter approach utilizing a vascular closure system (Fast and Furious PFA approach, FAST group). A total of 194 PVs were identified and isolated with PFA only (100%). The median procedural time was 26 (25, 30) min (FAST) and 65 (59, 72) min (control), respectively (P < 0.0001). The median fluoroscopy time was 5 (4, 7) min (FAST) and 12 (10, 14) min (control), respectively (P < 0.001). Freedom from AF recurrence at 12 months was 77% for the FAST group (vs. CONTROL: 81%, P = 0.856, and overall: 79%).
conclusionThe combination of a single venous puncture, single transseptal puncture approach utilizing PFA and vascular closure device resulted in a 100% rate of acute PVI and fast procedure with comparable safety, acute efficacy and 12-month outcome to the conventional approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40257635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.