ArticleProtoplasma2025
Biochemical validation for the therapeutic use of Plumeria rubra in coagulation disorders: a study combining in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches.
Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the protective effect of aqueous-methanolic leaf extract ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local healers in South Asia use Plumeria rubra Linn. leaves to treat various coagulation disorders in animals and humans. This study (in silico, in vitro, and in vivo) aimed to explore the pharmacological basis for the possible thrombolytic and anticlotting properties of the leaf extract of P. rubra. Phytoconstituents of P. rubra were dock against coagulation proteins: prothrombin, thromboplastin, and fibrin using in silico approach. Phytochemical screening, HPLC, and antioxidant, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic potential were evaluated using in vitro approach. Healthy male rabbits were divided into five groups (six rabbits each). Groups 1-3 were treated with aqueous-methanolic (30:70%) extract of P. rubra at 200, 300, and 600 mg/mL respectively groups in contrast to the positive and negative control groups. Thrombolytic activity was assessed at doses of 200, 300, and 600 µg/mL in comparison with standard urokinase (600 µg/kg). Platelet adhesion was evaluated at a dose of 200, 300, and 600 µg/mL against adrenaline (2 µM) and acute oral dose toxicity was assessed using in vivo approach. In silico study resulted in an excellent binding affinity and showed significant interaction with coagulation proteins. Phytochemical analysis showed a range of phytochemical classes: alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, glycosides, anthraquinones, and saponins. HPLC analysis confirmed the phytoconstituents plumericin, rutin, kaempferol, and isoquercetin already reported for coagulation disorders. P. rubra showed excellent antioxidant potential and was assessed using DPPH, NO, and SOD assays. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), bleeding time (BT), prothrombin time (PT), and clotting time (CT) all went up with increasing doses in the aqueous-methanolic extract (p ≤ 0.05). Comparing the plant extract to urokinase, the plant extract demonstrated considerable (p ≤ 0.05) clot lysis. Additionally, it dose-dependently delayed the ADR-induced platelet adhesion dose-dependently (p ≤ 0.05). The outcome of this study justifies its therapeutic utility in coagulation disorders and can be used as an alternative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40257629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.