Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Effectiveness of advanced platelet-rich fibrin on post-exodontia socket healing in patients who had undergone head and neck radiation.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analgesic effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A systematic review.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOsteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw is one of the most significant complications of radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC), and is primarily attributable to tooth extraction. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in preventing ORN after tooth extraction in patients with post-irradiated HNC and other postoperative complications.
methodsThe study population comprised 30 patients who previously underwent radiotherapy for HNC and subsequently underwent tooth extraction, with a total of 134 extractions performed. Extraction sockets were randomly assigned to receive either A-PRF (n = 67 [experimental group]); or clot maintenance alone (n = 67 [control group]). Patients were clinically evaluated at 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days postoperatively to assess pain and healing of the surgical site. The intensity of postoperative pain was quantified using a visual analog scale. Patients were clinically evaluated for up to 120 days to diagnose ORN. Other postoperative complications, including edema, bleeding, tissue color, consistency, and suppuration, were also evaluated.
resultsIn terms of pain and healing, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. No ORN or other surgical complications were observed. The use of A-PRF demonstrated no statistically significant differences compared with the control group in most of the parameters evaluated.
conclusionA-PRF yielded no additional benefits and did not influence the healing process in the short or medium term. RBR- 3 TDK22P: Date of registration: 02/14/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40257593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.