ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Biomechanical analysis of maxillary first molar intrusion using 3D printed personalized device combined with clear aligner: a finite element study and clinical application.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare the biomechanical effects of maxillary first molar intrusion using the fixed appliance, microimplant, and clear aligner with or without 3D printed personalized device, and to demonstrate the effect of this device through a relevant clinical case.
methodsA clinical patient with an overerupted maxillary molar was selected to construct a patient-oriented three-dimensional model of the four intrusion patterns. The initial displacement of the teeth and the stress distribution of the PDL were compared. The 3D printed personalized device was used in this case, and the data of the case was collected to assess the therapeutic effect.
resultsThe side effects of target tooth tilt and adjacent tooth displacement were obvious in fixed appliance and clear aligner, while the side effects were smaller in 3D printed personalized device, and the intrusion efficiency is slightly higher than that of microimplant. In clinical practice of 3D printed personalized device, a favorable intrusion effect was achieved.
conclusionsThe 3D printed personalized device had relatively high intrusion efficiency and stress relaxation on the target tooth and reduced the displacement and stress concentration on the anchorage teeth to a certain extent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In clinical practice, clear aligner with 3D printed personalized device has a good therapeutic effect on molar intrusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.