Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257563›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Efficient In-house Coupling of Sample and Library Preparation for ChIP-Seq of Histone Modifications in Complex Plant Tissues.

Jiaxin Long, Emily T Johnson, Joe Ogas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiaxin LongDepartment of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Emily T JohnsonDepartment of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Joe OgasDepartment of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. ogas@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ChIP-seq is a commonly used method to characterize chromatin-associated features on a genome-wide basis. A common set of steps for a ChIP-seq procedure prior to sequencing includes crosslinking, nuclei extraction, chromatin shearing, immunoprecipitation, elution, reversal of crosslinks, and library preparation. Plant material can be challenging to process for ChIP-seq analysis due to the unique attributes of plant cells that impair success. Here, we describe an effective ChIP-seq sample preparation method that is optimized for generating robust libraries from complex plant materials. In particular, we identify time as a critical parameter for effective coupling of ChIP-seq sample preparation with a commercially available kit to generate robust NGS libraries in-house. The resulting protocol is a cost-effective strategy to generate reliable ChIP-seq libraries from complex plant material and thereby acquire representative sequencing data.

Indexed as

Chromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingGene LibraryHistone CodeHistonesPlantsChromatinHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingChromatinHistonesArabidopsisChIP-seqChromatin immunoprecipitationHistone modificationsHistone variantsLibrary preparationPlant tissue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.