Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257491›Full record

SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological implications of mucin-type O-glycosylation dysregulation in colorectal cancer progression.

Wojciech Michał Jankowski, Jakub Fichna, Aleksandra Tarasiuk-Zawadzka

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Adhesion to aggression: unravelling sLeClinical & experimental metastasis · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wojciech Michał JankowskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowiecka 5, 92 - 215, Lodz, Poland.
Jakub FichnaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowiecka 5, 92 - 215, Lodz, Poland.
Aleksandra Tarasiuk-ZawadzkaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowiecka 5, 92 - 215, Lodz, Poland. aleksandra.tarasiuk-zawadzka@umed.lodz.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent malignancies globally, with 1.9 million new cases annually. While CRC pathogenesis has been widely attributed to the adenoma-carcinoma and serrated sequences, our study highlights the critical and multifaceted role of O-glycosylation impairment in this malignancy. Mucin-type O-glycosylation, a key post-translational modification, exerts significant effects on tumor cells, impacting their proliferation, migration, and invasiveness. Additionally, its influence on the immune response to CRC presents novel perspectives for potential therapeutic interventions. The authors conducted a systematic literature review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, using databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. In this article, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying mucin-type O-glycosylation disruption in CRC and examine how these mechanisms could serve as biomarkers for early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. Our findings contribute to a more detailed understanding of CRC pathogenesis and offer promising directions for innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, which in the future may lead to improved patient prognosis.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMucinsAnimalsDisease ProgressionGlycosylationHumansMucinsBiomarkersCarcinogenesisColorectal cancerMucinsO-glycosylation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.