ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Efficacy and safety of isatuximab monotherapy to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The real-world safety profile and potential mechanism of isatuximab: Integration of pharmacovigilance and transcriptomic analysis.Medicine · 2025Article
- Reduced ALDH1A1 expression in multiple myeloma cells increases resistance to daratumumab via downregulation of retinoic acid.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pooled analysis of phase 1 and 2 clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of isatuximab as monotherapy in individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had previously received a median of 4.0 lines of therapy; safety data for individuals on isatuximab plus dexamethasone has also been evaluated. The efficacy analysis (n = 167) showed that isatuximab 20 mg/kg monotherapy was effective in the treatment of individuals with RRMM, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.3%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 20.2 months. Isatuximab demonstrated rapid and sustained efficacy when used as monotherapy, with a median time to response of 1.0 month and a median duration of response of 10.3 months. The safety analysis, which included 477 participants from four clinical trials, showed that isatuximab had an acceptable safety profile that was consistent across all the dose groups examined. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion reactions (in 45.7% of participants), most of which were of grade 1 or 2 severity and occurred during the first infusion. Overall, no safety concerns were identified. In addition, participants aged ≥ 75 years had higher ORR and longer PFS and OS than those aged < 65 years, and since the proportions of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 did not vary significantly by age group, it appears that age does not affect the efficacy and safety of isatuximab treatment in RRMM. Further research is warranted to elaborate upon these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.