Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257476›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2025

Efficacy and safety of isatuximab monotherapy to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Meletios Dimopoulos, Kazutaka Sunami, Xavier Leleu, Ravi Vij, Cristina Gasparetto, Kenshi Suzuki, Sandrine Macé, Keisuke Tada, Mutsumi Hirakawa, Shinsuke Iida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meletios DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Kazutaka SunamiDepartment of Hematology, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Xavier LeleuCIC 1082, U1313, CHU, University, Poitiers, France.
Ravi VijDivision of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cristina GasparettoHematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kenshi SuzukiMyeloma/Amyloidosis Center, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Sandrine MacéResearch and Development, Sanofi, Paris, France.
Keisuke TadaResearch and Development, Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Mutsumi HirakawaOncology Medical, Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Shinsuke IidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kawasaki 1, Mizuno-cho, Mizuno-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan. iida@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-960X

Funding

Sanofi K.K. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pooled analysis of phase 1 and 2 clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of isatuximab as monotherapy in individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had previously received a median of 4.0 lines of therapy; safety data for individuals on isatuximab plus dexamethasone has also been evaluated. The efficacy analysis (n = 167) showed that isatuximab 20 mg/kg monotherapy was effective in the treatment of individuals with RRMM, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.3%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 20.2 months. Isatuximab demonstrated rapid and sustained efficacy when used as monotherapy, with a median time to response of 1.0 month and a median duration of response of 10.3 months. The safety analysis, which included 477 participants from four clinical trials, showed that isatuximab had an acceptable safety profile that was consistent across all the dose groups examined. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion reactions (in 45.7% of participants), most of which were of grade 1 or 2 severity and occurred during the first infusion. Overall, no safety concerns were identified. In addition, participants aged ≥ 75 years had higher ORR and longer PFS and OS than those aged < 65 years, and since the proportions of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 did not vary significantly by age group, it appears that age does not affect the efficacy and safety of isatuximab treatment in RRMM. Further research is warranted to elaborate upon these findings.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDexamethasoneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalRecurrenceAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDexamethasoneisatuximabDexamethasoneIsatuximabPooled analysisRelapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID40257476
PMCPMC12053118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.