Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257468›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Endovascular thrombectomy in young patients with large vessel occlusion stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin Lai, Xiaojuan Li, Muke Zhou

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin Lai *Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaojuan Li *Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Muke ZhouDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. muke.zhou@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in young stroke patients due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare the safety and efficacy of EVT in young patients (˂50 years) compared to older patients (≥ 50 years). A comprehensive literature search was conducted based on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. We included studies that directly compared clinical outcomes of EVT in young patients and older patients. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to measure functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2 at 90 days), successful recanalization (expanded TICI [eTICI] score ≥ 2b) rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates, and mortality at 90 days. A total of three studies were included, encompassing 11,575 patients. The pooled analysis demonstrated that EVT significantly improved functional independence (OR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.83-3.33; P < 0.00001) and reduced mortality (OR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.90; P = 0.03) in young patients, compared to older patients. Recanalization rates were higher than older patients (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.46; P = 0.03). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3.37% of young patients (30/889) and 4.50% of older patients (481/10686) (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P = 0.04). Endovascular thrombectomy is effective and safe in young patients with LVO stroke, leading to improved clinical outcomes, compared with older patients.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeThrombectomyHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesTreatment OutcomeAcute ischemic strokeEndovascular thrombectomyLarge vessel occlusionMeta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.