ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025
Incidental mediastinal masses detected on chest computed tomography scans during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uniportal subxiphoid thoracoscopic thymectomy with the Tian-Ping sternal lifter: a prospective non-randomized comparative study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Surgical management of 32 primary giant mediastinal neoplasms: a retrospective single-center analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Advantages of negative-pressure suction device compared to traditional chest closed drainage in the management of patients after mediastinal mass resection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk stratification of mediastinal masses using a predictive model based on CT radiomics and clinical data.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 and Myasthenic-like Symptom Complications in Two Relatives: A Coincidence or Spike Toxicity with Thymic Response in Predisposed Individuals? Two Clinical Cases with a Comprehensive Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe prevalence of mediastinal masses in large-scale populations in China has been rarely reported. During COVID19 pandemic, many incidentalomas were reported due to the large amount of chest computed tomography scan performed in emergency setting.
methodsRetrospective analysis of emergency chest computed tomography scans (February 2020-February 2021) for COVID-19 screening, including mediastinal abnormalities (excluding lymph nodes, dysplasia, pneumomediastinum and other non-mass alterations), with computed tomography features, diagnostic workup and 1 year follow-up data were reviewed.
resultsOf the 40 112 patients [mean age 54.5 (17.2) years; male-to-female ratio 1.02:1] screened for COVID-19, 293 (0.73%) had mediastinal masses of which 223 (0.56%) located in the anterior mediastinum. As participants aged, the prevalence tended to increase (P < 0.001). The prevalence was not different between the sexes (P = 0.635). An oval shape, anterior mediastinal location, and thymus involvement were the most common computed tomography characteristics. Surgery confirmed 11.3% (33 of 293) of nodal lesions, with a benign to malignant ratio of 51.4: 48.5. A computed tomography scan follow-up was conducted in 32.3% (84/260) of the patients, and in 82.1% (69/84) of cases the lesion was stable. Additionally, mediastinal masses were detected in 7.7% (20/260) of elderly patients who passed away soon after their primary disease worsened.
conclusionsIn Chinese COVID-19 screening chest computed tomography, the prevalence of all mediastinal masses and anterior mediastinal masses was 0.73% and 0.56%, respectively. Findings support risk-stratified management: growing/suspicious lesions warrant intervention versus surveillance for stable masses. Standardized protocols and multidisciplinary consensus are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.