ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
The influence of fluid boundary conditions on bio-inspired acoustic flow sensor.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One common approach to creating a flow sensor is to fabricate sensing elements that extend perpendicularly from the substrate, which typically provides sensor anchorage. However, this approach is impractical due to fabrication challenges, structural fragility, and integration constraints. This paper explores an alternative packaging method that integrates the sensor into a silicon chip for protection. Since this integration introduces boundary conditions from the substrate, which negatively affect sensor performance, the substrate is removed to modify the fluid boundary condition by transferring the sensing element to a designed cavity (3400 μm length, 1690 μm width, and 500 μm depth). This process eliminates surrounding material while preserving the sensor element for comparison before and after substrate removal. To illustrate this effect, the study presents examples that, while not optimized as flow sensors, could still demonstrate how boundary conditions influence sensor performance. Results indicate that removing the substrate increases viscous damping due to air interaction while reducing damping from substrate boundaries. This leads to lower pressure-referred noise levels and a higher signal-to-noise ratio. These findings could be useful for alternative packaging methods, where the substrate beneath the sensor is completely removed through back-etching. This approach provides protection while simultaneously preserving sensor performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.