Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257182›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.

Kudzai Shaun Mpakairi, Tatenda Dalu, Olga Laiza Kupika, Paradzayi Tagwireyi, Blessing Kavhu, Justice Muvengwi, Victor K Muposhi, Henry Ndaimani, Tinaapi Hilary Madiri, Edson Gandiwa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kudzai Shaun MpakairiDepartment of Earth Sciences, Institute of Water Studies, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-1464
Tatenda DaluSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Nelspruit, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9019-7702
Olga Laiza KupikaOkavango Research Institute, University of Botswana.
Paradzayi TagwireyiDepartment of Geography Geospatial Sciences and Earth Observation, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Blessing KavhuDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Justice MuvengwiSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Victor K MuposhiSchool of Wildlife Conservation, African Leadership University, Kigali, Rwanda.
Henry NdaimaniInternational Fund for Animal Welfare, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tinaapi Hilary MadiriScientific Services Unit, Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Edson GandiwaScientific Services Unit, Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Edmond SanganyadoDepartment of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the dominance of policies from the Global North has shaped conservation practices, holistic decision-making is urgently needed to incorporate more local voices, especially in Africa. Effective conservation strategies may be enhanced by incorporating the expertise and resources of the Global North alongside the knowledge, lived experiences, insights, and leadership of local communities, scientists, and civil society groups from the Global South. This approach fosters mutual respect, equitable partnerships, and shared accountability and moves away from parachute conservation models toward more inclusive and context-sensitive solutions for biodiversity conservation. We advocate for eliminating parachute conservation practices in Africa and emphasize the importance of more inclusive strategies prioritizing equitable north-south collaborations to address pressing biodiversity challenges. Key challenges in Africa include financial transparency issues, misaligned philanthropy, unbalanced representation of Indigenous perspectives, and the influence of international organizations. Possible mechanisms to move away from conservation practices driven by colonial legacies, legacies in which policies are often developed in the Global North and imposed on the Global South, sometimes without prior informed consent, include free, prior, and informed consent on projects and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms. By prioritizing the voices of local communities, including local scientific expertise and Indigenous knowledge systems, we posit that a more just and sustainable global environmental policy framework can be realized that can contribute to the long-term well-being of the planet and its people.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesCooperative BehaviorInternational CooperationAfricaciencia colonialcolaboraciones equitativascommunity‐led conservationconservación comunitariaequitable partnershipsIndigenous knowledge systemsparachute sciencesistemas de conocimiento indígena

Identifiers

PMID40257182
PMCPMC12309656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.