ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025
African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the dominance of policies from the Global North has shaped conservation practices, holistic decision-making is urgently needed to incorporate more local voices, especially in Africa. Effective conservation strategies may be enhanced by incorporating the expertise and resources of the Global North alongside the knowledge, lived experiences, insights, and leadership of local communities, scientists, and civil society groups from the Global South. This approach fosters mutual respect, equitable partnerships, and shared accountability and moves away from parachute conservation models toward more inclusive and context-sensitive solutions for biodiversity conservation. We advocate for eliminating parachute conservation practices in Africa and emphasize the importance of more inclusive strategies prioritizing equitable north-south collaborations to address pressing biodiversity challenges. Key challenges in Africa include financial transparency issues, misaligned philanthropy, unbalanced representation of Indigenous perspectives, and the influence of international organizations. Possible mechanisms to move away from conservation practices driven by colonial legacies, legacies in which policies are often developed in the Global North and imposed on the Global South, sometimes without prior informed consent, include free, prior, and informed consent on projects and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms. By prioritizing the voices of local communities, including local scientific expertise and Indigenous knowledge systems, we posit that a more just and sustainable global environmental policy framework can be realized that can contribute to the long-term well-being of the planet and its people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.