Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257142›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025

Diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA levels in gallbladder cancer: A study using qPCR & threshold evaluation.

Arpita Jindal, Sandeep Nijhawan, Urvashi Vijay, Ashmeet Kaur, Rohitashwa Dana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arpita JindalDepartment of Pathology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sandeep NijhawanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Urvashi VijayDepartment of Multidisciplinary Research Unit, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Ashmeet KaurDepartment of Pathology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Rohitashwa DanaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, often due to late-stage diagnosis. Existing diagnostic methods are invasive and not always feasible in resource-limited settings. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a potential non-invasive biomarker for malignancies, including GBC. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA levels in distinguishing GBC patients from healthy controls, considering its potential for early detection and personalised treatment. Methods This case-control study included 42 newly diagnosed GBC affected individuals and 15 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Plasma cfDNA was extracted using a bead-based protocol and quantified through quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting the β-globin gene. Diagnostic thresholds were identified using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and precision-recall curve analyses, assessing sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Results cfDNA levels were significantly elevated in GBC patients compared to controls (P<0.05), with a mean cfDNA level of 721 ng/ml. Four diagnostic offering distinct clinical thresholds were identified: 75.5 ng/ml, 130 ng/ml, 188 ng/ml, and 372.92 ng/ml. The ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94, indicating high diagnostic accuracy. cfDNA achieved high sensitivity (97.6% at 75.5 ng/ml) and 100 per cent specificity at 188 ng/ml. Interpretation & conclusion cfDNA serves as a reliable, non-invasive biomarker for GBC diagnosis, providing high diagnostic accuracy and utility in early detection and disease monitoring. These findings highlight cfDNA's potential as both a standalone diagnostic tool and a complementary marker to traditional tumour markers, enhancing diagnostic precision and aiding in personalised medicine. Its integration into diagnostic protocols can be particularly valuable in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsGallbladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidscfDNAgallbladder cancerliquid biopsyqPCRthreshold

Identifiers

PMID40257142
PMCPMC12010786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.