ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
The desat-max in 2-chair test appears to be a worthwhile parameter to identify sickness: An appraisal.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The precision bronchodilator therapy in airflow limitation with asthma defining reversibility: An appraisal through pharmaco-responsiveness-based real-world observation.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Appreciation of Increased Pulmonary Vascular Resistance from the Maximum Desaturation in 2-Chair Test: An Appraisal.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives The 2-chair test (2CT) has recently been proposed as a cardiopulmonary reserve-specific assessment of post-exercise recovery response. The objective of this study was to find out the most appropriate parameter of 2CT to categorically differentiate between 'normal' and symptomatic diseased population. Methods In a prospective manner, we recruited a random cohort of symptomatic patients attending our outpatient department (OPD) with different respiratory diseases. We also selected another cohort of 'normal' persons from the willing attendants of the patients who had no symptoms and revealed no abnormality on chest X-ray and spirometry. Persons belonging to both groups were requested to mark their 'sickness' on a scale of 0 to 10 ('0' meaning none and '10' meaning maximum possible) under the PPSS (patient-perceived sickness score) and were subjected to perform 2CT. All the test variables related to pulse rate and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) changes were noted for both groups. The 'symptomatic' and 'normal' persons were compared based on the 2CT variables to find the well-performing discriminatory parameter. Results The comparison of 2CT variables of 419 patients and 30 'normal' controls revealed that the PR change max, maximum SpO2, minimum-SpO2, and desat-max can significantly differentiate between the two. However, the desat-max correlated to the PPSS best. The VIP plot, primary component analysis, and pattern-hunter representation further substantiated this. Interpretation & conclusions The desat-max appears to be a sensitive parameter to differentiate the normal from the symptomatic diseased population. Further research in this area is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.