Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257135›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2025

Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection & its global regulatory landscape.

Isha Deepti, Bijaya Chettri, Anjali Mehra, Ann Merin Pinheiro, Ramya Ravi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isha DeeptiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs and Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Bijaya ChettriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs and Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Anjali MehraDepartment of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs and Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ann Merin PinheiroDepartment of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs and Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ramya RaviDepartment of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs and Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a known and useful treatment that involves introducing faeces from a healthy individual into the digestive tract of a diseased person. Clostridioides difficile is a substantial global health burden due to its high death rate in elderly populations and its ability to produce colitis and diarrhoea. Despite being used since millennia, FMT has recently become more well-known and two FMT products, namely Vowst and Rebyota also received FDA approval. Different nations address regulation in different ways. For instance, FMT is regulated as a drug in the US but is classified as a medicinal product in the UK. The regulatory frameworks among various European countries also vary; a working group, citing FMT as a transplant product, has requested for complete regulation. There are other classifications as well; in Australia, FMT is categorised as a biologic by the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Research indicates that FMT is beneficial in various illnesses, apart from CDI, due to its impact on the gut flora. Challenges include insufficient FMT product characterisation, ethical concerns, and limited hospital accessibility. There are still issues with data accessibility, security, and privacy, especially considering FMT's commercialisation. The official FMT recommendation for recurrent CDI is emphasised from the perspective of public health, with the argument that early implementation could limit antibiotic overuse and prevent antibiotic resistance. Initiatives like the Universal Stool Bank concept aim to streamline donor selection and distribution procedures to minimise operational restrictions.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansRecurrenceClostridioides difficile infection (CDI)colitisfaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)gut florapublic healthrecurrent CDI (RCDI)stoolstool bank

Identifiers

PMID40257135
PMCPMC12010788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.