ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection & its global regulatory landscape.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the Gut-Heart Axis in Atherosclerosis: Microbial Metabolites, Molecular Mechanisms, and Precision Therapeutics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota as modulators of obesity and overweight: a registry-based systematic review of clinical trial evidence.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Fecal microbiota transplant and its usefulness in hepatic disorders: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Microbial and Metabolic Disorders in Cervical Cancer: Structural Insights, Biomarkers, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Strategies.Cancer science · 2025Review
- Gut Microbiota and Neurodevelopment in Preterm Infants: Mechanistic Insights and Prospects for Clinical Translation.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Laboratory preparation methods for human-derived fecal microbial suspensions for fecal microbiota transplantation: a review and standardization perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a known and useful treatment that involves introducing faeces from a healthy individual into the digestive tract of a diseased person. Clostridioides difficile is a substantial global health burden due to its high death rate in elderly populations and its ability to produce colitis and diarrhoea. Despite being used since millennia, FMT has recently become more well-known and two FMT products, namely Vowst and Rebyota also received FDA approval. Different nations address regulation in different ways. For instance, FMT is regulated as a drug in the US but is classified as a medicinal product in the UK. The regulatory frameworks among various European countries also vary; a working group, citing FMT as a transplant product, has requested for complete regulation. There are other classifications as well; in Australia, FMT is categorised as a biologic by the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Research indicates that FMT is beneficial in various illnesses, apart from CDI, due to its impact on the gut flora. Challenges include insufficient FMT product characterisation, ethical concerns, and limited hospital accessibility. There are still issues with data accessibility, security, and privacy, especially considering FMT's commercialisation. The official FMT recommendation for recurrent CDI is emphasised from the perspective of public health, with the argument that early implementation could limit antibiotic overuse and prevent antibiotic resistance. Initiatives like the Universal Stool Bank concept aim to streamline donor selection and distribution procedures to minimise operational restrictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.