Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40257118›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2025

Improving the design and analytic methods used in NIH-funded clinical trials involving behavioral interventions.

David M Murray, Jane M Simoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M MurrayAssociate Director for Prevention, Director, Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 734B, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-9269
Jane M SimoniAssociate Director for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, Director, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, Room B1C19, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8711-1576

Funding

NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral interventions are widely used in clinical trials supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). When behavioral interventions involve group-formatted components and/or shared interventionists, they require special design and analytic methods not needed in trials that do not involve these features. The NIH Office of Disease Prevention (ODP) and the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) offer resources to make it easier for investigators to use appropriate methods to evaluate these interventions. This commentary draws attention to these issues and highlights the ODP and OBSSR resources available to investigators. We urge investigators to take advantage of these resources to learn about and adopt appropriate sample size and analytic methods for trials to evaluate behavioral interventions so that their results will be reliable and reproducible. That is the best way to advance the science of behavioral interventions to improve health.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyClinical Trials as TopicNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Research DesignHumansUnited Statesanalytic methodsbehavioral interventionsample size methodsstudy design

Identifiers

PMID40257118
PMCPMC12010243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.